Skaggs v. Bowser
Skaggs v. Bowser
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JASON DOUGLAS SKAGGS, Petitioner, Case No. 6:18-cv-01287-CL
v. ORDER MR. BOWSER; BRIDGETT AMSBERRY, Superintendent TRCI, Respondent.
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 51), and the matter is now before this Court on Petitioner’s objections. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1445(9th Cir. 1988). The Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 51) is adopted in full. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED and the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
1 -ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 11th day of March, 2021.
__s/Michael J. McShane_________________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown