Stay Frosty Enterprises LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Stay Frosty Enterprises LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

STAY FROSTY ENTERPRISES, LLC No. 3:18-cv-00283-SB

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [122] on March 10, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against Defendant Milcoins.com, LLC (“Milcoins”). The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1444

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [122]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [116] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __M__a_r_c_h_ 3_1_,_ _2_0_2_1___________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown