Schalk v. Infinity Insurance Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Schalk v. Infinity Insurance Company

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

STEVEN SCHALK, No. 3:20-cv-00615-YY

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

INFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued a Findings and Recommendation on April 16, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1444

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [27].

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [11] is DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [8] is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____M_a__y_ 1_0_,_ 2__0_2_1__________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown