Shirley v. Kelly

District Court, D. Oregon

Shirley v. Kelly

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JOSIAH TIMOTHY SHIRLEY,

Petitioner, Civ. No. 6:18-cv-01113-CL

v. ORDER

BRANDON KELLY,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#40), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#40) is adopted. The petitioner (#1) is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED on grounds that petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of May, 2021.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown