Menchu v. Multnomah County Health Department

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JERRY ALEXANDER MENCHU, No. 3:20-cv-00559-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation on May 3, 2021, in which he recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [24]. F&R, ECF No. 33. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 33]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike Amended Complaint GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____J_u_n__e_ 1_4_,_ _2_0_2_1__________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge