IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

KHOSROW RAHIMI, No. 3:20-cv-01607-AC

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

CITY OF SHERIDAN and STATE OF OREGON,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge John Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation on June 28, 2021, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss. F&R, ECF 23. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 25. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report.

(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall,

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no

basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [23]. Therefore, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss [9], [18] are GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______J_u_ly_ _2_8_,_ 2_0_2__1_____.

____________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge