Zurich American Insurance Company v. Centimark Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE No. 3:21-cv-00647-YY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE

INSURANCE COMPANY, ACE ORDER AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a/s/o/ Aimbridge Hospitality LLC,

Plaintiffs, v.

CENTIMARK CORPORATION, a

Pennsylvania corporation,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation on June 28, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and remand this case to Washington County Circuit Court. F&R, ECF 20. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [20].

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [12] is GRANTED and this case is remanded to Washington County Circuit Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________A__u_g_u_s_t_ 1_0_,_ _2_0_2_1___.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge