IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JULIE L.C.,1 Case No. 1:19-cv-01598-CL OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

AIKEN, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) (doc. 19) on August 10, 2021 in which he recommends that the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision be affirmed. The matter is now before me pursuant to

(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the F&R. Doc. 21. Accordingly, I must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ.

1 In the interest of privacy, this Opinion uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. P. 72(b)(3); Dawson v. Marshall,

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). I have carefully considered plaintiff’s objections and conclude that they do not provide a basis to

modify the F&R. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no error in the F&R. Thus, the Court ADOPTS Judge Clarke’s F&R (doc. 19). The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED, and this case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this _2_7_t_h_ day of September 2021.

________/_s_/A__n_n_ _A_i_k_e_n_______ Ann Aiken United States District Judge