IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

EBONY HARDAWAY, No. 3:21-cv-00461-AC

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

WESTROCK SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation on August 11, 2021, in which he recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff’s motion to remand. F&R, ECF 23. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 26. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report.

(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall,

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [23]. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand [5] is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __S_e_p_t_e_m__b_e_r_ 2_8_,_ 2__0_2_1____.

___________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge