Turay v. Beaverton Police Department

District Court, D. Oregon

Turay v. Beaverton Police Department

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON AHMED G. TURAY, JR., Plaintiff, Case No. 3:21-cv-01112-CL

v. ORDER BEAVERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 5, and the matter is now before this court.! See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Ireview de novo. United States vy. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9" Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 5, is adopted in full. Because the defects in Plaintiff's complaint cannot be cured by amendment, Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. 2, is dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although Plaintiff failed to file timely objections, he moves for leave to file an amended complaint. Pl.’s Mot., ECF No. 8. Because Plaintiffs claims are barred by the statute of limitations, any amendment would be futile. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, ECF No. 8, is DENIED. 1 -ORDER

DATED this 22nd day of October, 2021.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 –ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown