Hernandez v. Myers
Hernandez v. Myers
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ARACELY HERNANDEZ,
Petitioner, Civ. No. 3:20-cv-01792-CL
v. Order
PAULA MYERS, Superintendent, Coffee Creek Correctional Facility,
Respondent. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#24), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1445(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#24) is adopted. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (#1) is DENIED. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). DATED this 16th day of November, 2021. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown