Moye v. TriMet

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

BRANDON MOYE, SR., No. 3:20-cv-00701-YY Plaintiff, ORDER v.

TRIMET,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation on September 23, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. F&R, ECF 23. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation No. 23.

Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [19] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____N_o_v_e_m__b_e_r_ 1__6_, _2_0_2_1______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge