Smith v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Smith v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
GREG ALAN SMITH, Civil No. 3:20-CV-00619-BR
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 2412COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant.
For the reasons set forth in the parties’ stipulated motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA),
28 U.S.C. § 2412, et seq., and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiff is hereby awarded $1700.98 in fees under the EAJA. Under Astrue v. Ratliff,
130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29(2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (
31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Any EAJA fees should therefore be awarded to Plaintiff and not to Plaintiff’s attorney. If, after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has assigned her right to EAJA fees to her attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’ s attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check or ETF made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of October, 2021.
/s/ Anna J. Brown ____________________________________ UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
Submitted by:
SCOTT ERIK ASPHAUG, OSB #833674 United States Attorney
RENATA GOWIE, OSB #175273 Civil Division Chief
s/ Shata L. Stucky SHATA L. STUCKY Special Assistant United States Attorney of Attorneys for Defendant (206) 615-2909
Reference
- Status
- Unknown