Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Bureau of Land Management

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS

CENTER, et al.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:19-cv-1810-CL v.

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND ORDER

MANAGEMENT, et al.,

Federal Defendants, and

MURPHY COMPANY,

Intervenor-Defendant. ___________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 46), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiffs filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. ECF No. 50. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) is adopted.

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) is DENIED. Defendant’s Cross Motion –ORDER for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED. Intervenor-Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED to the extent it aligns with BLM’s motion. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 16th day of November, 2021. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane

United States District Judge

2 –ORDER