Cascadia Wildlands v. United States Bureau of Land Management
Cascadia Wildlands v. United States Bureau of Land Management
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CASCADIA WILDLANDS, an Oregon non-profit corporation; and OREGON WILD, an Oregon non-profit corporation,,
Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 6:20-cv-1395-MK
v. ORDER
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an administrative agency of the United States Department of Interior,
Defendant;
SENECA SAWMILL COMPANY, an Oregon corporation _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 43), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). AlL parties filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. 1 –ORDER Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 43) is adopted. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED in part as recommended in the Findings and Recommendation. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 26, 28) are GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s NEPA claim and DENIED in all other respects. The underlying Project is REMANDED to BLM and the Decision Notice and Finding of No
Significant Impact is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 3rd day of January, 2022. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown