IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DERRICK DEAN COFFELT, No. 6:20-cv-00849-AC

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

SARAH LAPHAN,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation on August 26, 2021, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. F&R, ECF 31. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [31].

Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [15] is granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____J_a_n_u__a_ry_ _2_5_,_ 2_0_2__2_______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge