IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PAPI, LLC, an Oregon limited liability No. 3:21-cv-00405-JR Company, dba Papi Chulo’s Restaurant, Individually and on behalf of all others ORDER similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on November 10, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and dismiss this case with prejudice. F&R, ECF 24. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal

principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [24]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [9] is granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice. Pending motions are denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____F_e_b_r_u_a_r_y_ 1_6_,_ 2__0_2_2_______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge