IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

GREGORY SIEFKEN, No. 6:17-cv-01930-SB

Petitioner, ORDER

v.

BRANDON KELLY,

Respondent.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation on November 16, 2021, in which she recommends that this Court dismiss the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with prejudice and decline to issue a Certificate of Appealability. F&R, ECF 92. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Petitioner filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. Pet. Obj., ECF No. 99. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report.

(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall,

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Petitioner’s objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation, No. 92. Therefore, Siefken’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, No. 50, is dismissed with prejudice, and the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___F_e_b_ru__a_ry_ _1_5_,_ 2_0_2__2_____

_________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge