Penry v. Hendrix

District Court, D. Oregon

Penry v. Hendrix

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CHARLES W. PENRY, Petitioner, Case No. 3:21-cv-00692-MK

v. ORDER D. HENDRIX, Warden, Respondent.

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 10), and the matter is now before this Court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although Petitioner did not file objections, I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is adopted in full. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 483-84

(2000). 1 -ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 14th day of March, 2022.

/s/ Michael J. McShane Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 –ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown