IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

RILEY D., Case No. 6:20-cv-00101-SB

Plaintiff,

vs. ORDER COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

BECKERMAN, Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Riley D. brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits. On September 30, 2020, the Court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and ordered that the case be remanded for additional proceedings. Order, ECF 13. Judgment was also entered on that date. J., ECF 14. On March 29, 2022, Plaintiff’s counsel received notice of Plaintiff’s award for benefits. Pl. Mot. Ex. 1, ECF 17. Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to

(b). Pl. Mot., ECF 17. Defendant has no objection to the request.

The Court has reviewed the record in the case, the motion, and the supporting materials including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with counsel, and the recitation of counsel’s hours and services. Applying the standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,

(2002), the Court finds the requested fees reasonable. The Court GRANTS the motion (motions the Court for approval of [17] and awards Plaintiffs counsel $9,709.50 in attorney’s fees under

(b). When issuing the section 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiff's attorney, the Commissioner is directed to subtract the amount previously received under EAJA and send Plaintiff's attorney the balance of $3,615.14 less any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. Any amount withheld after all administrative and court attorney’s fees are paid should be released to Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 2, 2022. Syue ay Hon. Stacie F. Beckerman U.S. Magistrate Judge

Prepared by: John E. Haapala, Jr. OSB No.061739 Attorney for Plaintiff

2 —ORDER