Greenspan v. Matrix Capital Group, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Greenspan v. Matrix Capital Group, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

RONALD F. GREENSPAN, in his capacity No. 3:21-cv-01018-JR as COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER for the RECEIVERSHIP ENTITY, including ORDER AEQUITAS COMMERCIAL FINANCE, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, and CAREPAYMENT, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. MATRIX CAPITAL GROUP, INC., a New York corporation; and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on April 28, 2022, in which she recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. F&R, ECF 19. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1444

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal

principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [19]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is granted [16]. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________M_a_y_ _1_8_,_ 2_0_2__2______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown