IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MARLA C., No. 2:21-cv-00337-HL

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

COMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Hallman issued a Findings and Recommendation on May 23, 2022, in which he recommends that the Court reverse and remand this case for calculation and payment of benefits. F&R, ECF 23. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hallman’s Findings and Recommendation [23]. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Remand to Agency [20]. The

Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for immediate payment of benefits. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____J_u__ly_ _7_, _2_0_2_2____________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge