IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JOHN MORRIS III, No. 3:22-cv-301-JR

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

BIOTRONIK, INC.; JOHN DOES 1- 10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; ROE NON- PROFIT CORPORATIONS 1-10; and ROE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10,

Defendants

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on July 11, 2022, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, dismiss this action, and deny Defendant’s previous motion to dismiss as moot. F&R, ECF 45. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.

Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [45]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration [37] is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [13] is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______A__u_g_u_s_t_ 2_5_,_ 2__0_2_2______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge