Spangler v. Hendrix

District Court, D. Oregon

Spangler v. Hendrix

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MARK SPANGLER, Case No. 3:22-cv-00524-MK

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v.

DEWAYNE HENDRIX,

Respondent. _____________________________

MCSHANE, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) in this action, recommending that the Petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The matter is now before me. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the magistrate’s report is correct. 1 – ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Kasubhai Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is ADOPTED, and the Petition (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 24th day of October, 2022.

/s/ Michael J. McShane MICHAEL J. MCSHANE United States District Judge

2 – ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Reference

Status
Unknown