Jay v. Rodriguez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DERRICK JERMAINE JAY, No. 6:22-cv-00469-SB Plaintiff, ORDER v. OFFICER GUSTAVO RODRIGUEZ; OFFICER KATIE SANCHEZ; and CAPTAIN JONATHAN HYDE, Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation on November 14, 2022, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss. F&R, ECF 15. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [15].

Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [11] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 12/21/22 MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge -—-ORDER