Harper-Leonard v. Washburn

District Court, D. Oregon

Harper-Leonard v. Washburn

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JACOB HARPER-LEONARD, No. 2:21-cv-00539-JE

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

SUE WASHBURN,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation on November 14, 2022, in which he recommends that this Court deny the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismiss this matter with prejudice, and deny a certificate of appealability. F&R, ECF 37. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Petitioner filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. Pet. Obj., ECF No. 41. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall,

561 F.3d 930, 932

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Petitioner’s objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks’ Findings and Recommendation [37]. Therefore, the Court denies the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [1], dismisses this matter with prejudice, and denies a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____J_a_n_u_a_r_y_ _1_3_, _2_0_2_3_____.

___________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown