Bompane v. Brown
Bompane v. Brown
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
JASON BOMPANE, No. 3:22-cv-00357-AR
Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
SHARON BROWN, NANCY RONAN, and WELLPATH LLC,
Defendants.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Armistead issued a Findings and Recommendation on January 5, 2023, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss. F&R, ECF 20. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Armistead’s Findings and Recommendation [20]. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [12] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may submit an amended complaint within 30 days of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ___F__e_b_r_u_a_ry_ _2_4_,_ 2_0__2_3_______.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown