Tuttle v. Saint Alphonsus Medical Center
Tuttle v. Saint Alphonsus Medical Center
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
JOSIAH TUTTLE, No. 2:22-cv-01022-HL
Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
SAINT ALPHONSUS MEDICAL CENTER,
Defendant.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Hallman issued a Findings and Recommendation on February 16, 2023, in which he recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice. F&R, ECF 9. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hallman’s Findings and Recommendation [9]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint [1] is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ____M_a_r_c_h_ _1_4_, _2_0_2_3__________.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown