IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CALVIN JACKSON, JR., No. 2:20-cv-01090-SB

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

TROY BOWSER, DR. VRIESMAN, S. JOHNSTON, C. DIGIULIO, T. BUGHER,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation on February 7, 2023, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. F&R, ECF 67. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF No. 74. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report.

(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall,

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [67]. Therefore, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [52] is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______M__a_r_c_h_ 2_9_,_ _2_0_2_3____.

___________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge