IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CARL A. WESCOTT, No. 3:23-cv-00145-YY

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

MR. ROGER M. POLLOCK, and DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation on March 14, 2023, in which she recommends that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to

(e)(2)(B)(ii). F&R, ECF 7. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [7]. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______A_p__ri_l _1_8_, _2_0_2_3_________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge