Swanson v. DOJ
Swanson v. DOJ
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MICHAEL SWANSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 6:22-cv-01304-MK Vv. ORDER DEPARTMENT OF JUDTICE, et al.,
Defendants.
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 13), and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiff’s objections.! See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1445(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) is adopted in full. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9) is DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) is DENIED as moot; and Plaintiffs motions for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 10, 11) are DENIED.
' The Court construes Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Review (ECF No. 15) and Concise Statement of Material Fact (ECF No. 16) as objections to Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation. 1 -ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 28th day of April, 2023.
_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown