Downs v. Oregon Board of Parole

District Court, D. Oregon

Downs v. Oregon Board of Parole

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

ELIZABETH DIANE DOWNS, Case No. 3:22-cv-01993-MK

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATION

OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE,

Respondent. _____________________________

MCSHANE, District Judge. Petitioner brought this federal habeas action pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

and challenged a 2020 decision of the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision deferring Petitioner’s parole consideration date. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai issued Findings and Recommendations and recommends that the Petition be denied. The matter is now before this Court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 1 - ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,

656 F.2d 1309, 1313

(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and

conclude the recommendation is correct. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) is ADOPTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED on the basis that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2). Dated this 14th day of November, 2023.

s/ Michael J. McShane MICHAEL J. MCSHANE United States District Judge

2 - ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Reference

Status
Unknown