Downs v. Oregon Board of Parole
Downs v. Oregon Board of Parole
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
ELIZABETH DIANE DOWNS, Case No. 3:22-cv-01993-MK
Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATION
OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE,
Respondent. _____________________________
MCSHANE, District Judge. Petitioner brought this federal habeas action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254and challenged a 2020 decision of the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision deferring Petitioner’s parole consideration date. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai issued Findings and Recommendations and recommends that the Petition be denied. The matter is now before this Court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 1 - ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and
conclude the recommendation is correct. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) is ADOPTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED on the basis that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Dated this 14th day of November, 2023.
s/ Michael J. McShane MICHAEL J. MCSHANE United States District Judge
2 - ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Reference
- Status
- Unknown