IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL No. 3:18-cv-01420-AR ADVOCATES, a non-profit organization,

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a United States Government Agency; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, a United States Government Agency,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Armistead issued a Findings and Recommendation on September 15, 2023, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 48) and grant Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 57). F&R, ECF [65]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.

Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Armistead’s Findings and Recommendation [65]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [48] is DENIED and Defendants’ Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment [57] is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______N__o_v_e_m__b_e_r _2_6_,_ 2_0__2_3__.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge