IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

GABRIELA C. BELCIU and GIULIANO BELCIU, No. 3:23-cv-01632-SB

Plaintiffs, ORDER

v.

LEGACY HEALTH,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation on May 22, 2024, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and dismiss Plaintiff Giuliano Belciu’s claim with prejudice and dismiss Plaintiff Gabriela Belciu’s claim with leave to amend. F&R, ECF 17. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [17]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [8] is granted. Plaintiff Giulanio Belciu’s claim is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Gabriela Belciu’s claim is dismissed with leave to amend. Any amended complaint is due within 30 days of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________J_u_ly_ _3_, _2_0_2_4_________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge