Harris v. Allied Universal Security Services, LP

District Court, D. Oregon

Harris v. Allied Universal Security Services, LP

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DANIEL HARRIS, Civ. No. 6:23-cv-1644-MK ORDER

Plaintiff, v.

ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, LP; and G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA) INC.,

Defendant. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#18), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#18) is adopted. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (#11) is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 21st of February, 2024. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – JUDGMENT

Reference

Status
Unknown