IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DAVID EDGAR WONNACOTT, No. 2:19-cv-00567-JR

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

CAPTAIN DAVID HEEHN, et al.,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on February 28, 2024, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant Richard Carpenter’s Motion for Summary Judgment. F&R, ECF 97. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [97]. Accordingly, Defendant Carpenter’s Motion for Summary Judgment [89] is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____A__p_ri_l _5_,_ 2_0_2_4____________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge