Muzgay v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Muzgay v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
HENRY M., No. 6:22-cv-01839-JR
Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
COMMISSONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on February 8, 2024, in which she recommends that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision and dismiss this case. F&R, ECF 23. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [23].
Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed, and this case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ________M_a_y_ _1_3_,_ 2_0_2__4_______.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown