District Court, D. Oregon, 2024

Naumov v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

Naumov v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
District Court, D. Oregon · Decided May 14, 2024
Naumov v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

VICTOR NAUMOV, No. 3:23-cv-01120-JR Plaintiff, ORDER v. SHELLPOINT MORTGAGING SERVICE, A division of New Rez; Wilmington SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB Trust, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., DTCC, MERS, H&H PREFERRED REAL ESTATE, and SAVE ON RECYCLING AND TOWING, Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on April 2, 2024, in which she recommends that the Court grant Shellpoint’s Motion to Dismiss and deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Change of Jurisdiction and Bill of Exceptions. F&R, ECF 33. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [33].

Accordingly, Shellpoint’s Motion to Dismiss [25] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Change of Jurisdiction and Bill of Exceptions [30] is DENIED. Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______M_a_y_ _1_4_,_ 2_0_2__4________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.