Windsor v. Campos

District Court, D. Oregon

Windsor v. Campos

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PRINCE’ AMELIO MASON WINDSOR, I,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 2:24-cv-00099-CL

v. ORDER

SGT. A. CAMPOS, S. RENN, B. IRVING, and N. SOBOTTA,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#40), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#40) is adopted. Defendants’ Motion for summary judgment (#29) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of March, 2025. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown