IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

STEVEN JONES, Case No. 3:25-cv-01184-JR Plaintiff, ORDER v.

ERIC GALOSGOWSKY,

Defendant.

BAGGIO, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Russo issued her Findings and Recommendations on October 14, 2025, in which she recommends that this Court dismiss Plaintiff’s case with prejudice. F&R, ECF No. 9. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendations [9]. Therefore, Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint [8] is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 24th day of November, 2025.

AMY M. BAGGIO United States District Judge

2 — ORDER