Kristina Marie Stafford v. Carol Klier, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON KRISTINA MARIE STAFFORD, Case No. 6:25-cv-01823-JR Plaintiff, ORDER TO DISMISS v. CAROL KLIER, et al., Defendants.

BAGGIO, District Judge Plaintiff, an adult in custody at the Douglas County Jail, brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action as a self-represented litigant. On December 10, 2025, Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo issued an Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 10) finding that plaintiff’s Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and requiring plaintiff to show cause why it should not be summarily dismissed as required under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b).

Currently before the Court is plaintiff’s Response to Order Show Cause (ECF No. 10), which includes a proposed Amended Complaint.

Plaintiff’s Response and proposed Amended Complaint fail to cure the deficiencies noted in Judge Russo’s Order to Show Cause. Specifically, although plaintiff’s proposed Amended Complaint eliminates all but three of the defendants identified in her original Complaint, plaintiff continues to assert claims that are barred under the principles of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) and Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and asserts damages claims against two defendants who are entitled to absolute immunity, the state judge and assistant district attorney.

Accordingly, plaintiff has not demonstrated any basis upon which dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted is not required, and this action must be dismissed.

CONCLUSION For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because it is clear that deficiencies of plaintiff's Complaint cannot be cured by amendment, the dismissal is with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 12th day of January 2026.

Amy M. Baggio United States District Judge 1 To the extent plaintiff's claims are barred under Heck, dismissal is without prejudice. See Washington v. L.A. County Sheriff's Dep’t, 883 F.3d 1048, 1056 (9th Cir. 2016) (“a Heck dismissal is made without prejudice’’).

2 — ORDER TO DISMISS