Matthew Seth Olsen v. C/O Tyler Gribble and Multnomah County Health Department

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MATTHEW SETH OLSEN, Case No. 3:24-cv-01461-AR Plaintiff, ORDER v. C/O TYLER GRIBBLE and MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Defendants.

BAGGIO, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead issued a Findings and Recommendation on September 30, 2025, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. F&R, ECF No. 39. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Plaintiff, proceeding as a self-represented party, filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. Pl.’s Obj., ECF No. 41. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Plaintiffs objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Armistead’s Findings and Recommendation [39].

Therefore, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [28] is GRANTED. The Parties shall submit a joint proposed judgment within 14 days of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26thday of January, 2026.

AMY M. BAGGIO United States District Judge —ORDER