General Insurance Company of America v. Penco, Inc. and Peninsula Iron Works

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF Case No. 3:25-cv-01335-SB AMERICA, a foreign insurance company doing business in the State of Oregon, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, v. PENCO, INC., a dissolved Oregon corporation, and PENINSULA IRON WORKS, an Oregon business entity, Defendants.

IMMERGUT, District Judge.

No objections to Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”), ECF 30, have been filed, and this Court adopts in full the F&R. Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), as amended, the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). If a party objects to a magistrate judge’s F&R, “the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. But the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–50 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

This Court ADOPTS Judge Beckerman’s F&R, ECF 30, and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ECF 23.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 18th day of May, 2026.

/s/ Karin J. Immergut Karin J. Immergut United States District Judge