McDonald v. Cruzen
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Coblentz v. State Industrial Accident Commission (Or. 1955)
- Hutchings v. Royal Bakery (Or. 1913)
- Lundgren v. Cupp (Or. Ct. App. 1969)
- Holder v. Harris (Or. 1927)
- Williams v. Pacific Surety Co. (Or. 1912)
- Aiken v. City of Columbus (Ind. 1906)
- Powell v. D. S. & G. R. R. (Or. 1886)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
There is no authority given by the laws of Oregon under which a justice of the peace might, for any cause, render a judgment against a prosecuting witness in the
The judgment in that case was wholly void.
We think there is sufficient set forth in the complaint below to require an answer, and the judgment will be reversed.
Upon, the matter of entering final judgment in such cases here, or of remanding them for further proceeding below, we announce that:
Upon appeal from a judgment upon demurrer below, it is the general rule that judgment of affirmance here is final; but this court will hold a discretionary control in cases where cause is alleged for re-hearing, or for further proceedings below.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.