Oregon Supreme Court, 1890

Riddle v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court · Decided January 9, 1890

18 Or. 460; 23 P. 807; 1890 Ore. LEXIS 143

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

Saling v. First Nat. Bank (Or. 1919)
Wilson v. Willamette Industries, Inc. (Or. 1977)
Chaffin v. Solomon (Or. 1970)
Hawkins v. Savage (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 1953)
Matsuda v. Noble and Decoster (Or. 1948)
Teshner v. Roome (Or. 1922)
Partlow v. Clark (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
Thompson v. Hendricks (Or. 1926)
First Nat. Bank v. Gage (Or. 1914)
Mertens v. Northern State Bank (Or. 1913)
Jennings v. Lentz (Or. 1908)
May v. Emerson (Or. 1908)
Haines v. Connell (Or. 1906)
Security Trust Co. v. Loewenberg (Or. 1900)
Laurent v. Lanning (Or. 1897)
Meier v. Hess (Or. 1893)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The only question of law arising upon *461this record wre considered and decided in Wood v. Rayburn, 18 Or. 3. We see no- reason to depart from the conclusions there announced. After a careful examination of the evidence we have reached the same conclusions that the court below did. We do not think a particular examination of the facts disclosed by the evidence is necessary.

The decree appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.