Hislop v. Moldenhauer
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Overton v. Blake (Or. 1976)
- Peterson v. Beals (Or. 1921)
- Basim v. Wade (Or. 1906)
- Willis v. Lance (Or. 1896)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion
1. Where a judgment for costs and disbursements is rendered in favor of the defendant, and a cost bill in due form is filed within the time allowed by law, and no objection filed or made thereto within two days thereafter, it is error for the trial court to permit objections to such cost bill to be filed five months thereafter, without a showing that the failure to file objections within the two days allowed by law was through the plaintiff’s mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.
2. A journal entry reciting that a judgment was rendered and entered on the twenty-fourth of May, 1892, cannot be contradicted in this court by a memorandum kept by the clerk and certified by him indicating that it was actually rendered on the twentieth of the month.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.