Craft v. Northern Pacific Railroad
Craft v. Northern Pacific Railroad
25 Or. 275; 35 P. 250; 1894 Ore. LEXIS 14
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gillispie v. Beta Construction Co. (Alaska 1992)
- Escobedo v. Ward (Or. 1970)
- Schleiger v. Northern Terminal Co. (Or. 1903)
- Beerbower v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
As this case involves the same question decided in Putman v. S. P. Co. 21 Or. 244, we are of the opinion that the right of action given by section 34, Hill’s Code, to a parent or guardian for the injury or death of a child, is confined to minority, and that the view expressed on rehearing in that case should control and be decisive of the present case.
Judgment affirmed. Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.