Silverfield v. Frank
Silverfield v. Frank
Opinion of the Court
after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.
The only question for decision is whether the fence or structure which the defendant was engaged in building at the time the suit was commenced was a violation of the clause in the contract between him and the plaintiff which provides: “ No house shall be erected on said south twenty feet, and no fence, other than a wire or iron fence,six feet high, shall be erected on the north line of said south twenty feet during the ownership of said north eighty feet o'f said lots by said Silverfield.” The defendant’s view is that the contract does not restrict the use of the property by him, except that he shall put no house thereon, and shall build no fence' on the north line except of a certain character; otherwise he may use it as he pleases, and may therefore build a high board fence or structure at any place on the .property he may desire, except on the north line. The object to be accomplished in construing a contract is to arrive at the intention of. the parties as expressed by the language used. When the language is ambiguous, the surrounding circumstances afford material aid to this end.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SILVERFIELD v. FRANK
- Status
- Published