Oregon Supreme Court, 1910

Commercial National Bank v. Temple

Commercial National Bank v. Temple
Oregon Supreme Court · Decided June 14, 1910
56 Or. 543; 109 P. 129; 1910 Ore. LEXIS 199
Commercial National Bank v. Temple

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from Umatilla County. The transcript was filed November 18, 1909. On April 21, 1910, plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and to affirm the judgment, for the reason that defendants have failed to file a brief within the 30 days after the filing of the transcript, as required by Rule 37 of this court, 50 Or. 589 (91 Pac. xii). There is no appearance upon this motion by defendant, and as no brief was filed by him, as required, the motion is allowed, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment affirmed. State v. Horn, 39 Or. 152 (65 Pac. 1066); Schafer v. Beecher, 54 Or. 273 (101 Pac. 899.) Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.