Oregon Supreme Court, 1913

Lafky v. Albert

Oregon Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 1913 · Burnett, McBride, Moore, Ramsey

68 Or. 373; 137 P. 208; 1913 Ore. LEXIS 127

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Mount v. Welsh (Or. 1926)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice McBride.

This is an action for libel. The defendant demurred on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. We have examined the record, and are of the opinion that the language used is not libelous per se; and, there being no innuendo, the demurrer was properly sustained. As no good purpose would be served by perpetuating in the Oregon Reports the article over which the action arose, we omit it from the opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Moore, Mr. Justice Burnett and Mr. Justice Ramsey concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.