Oregon Supreme Court, 1913

Lafky v. Albert

Lafky v. Albert
Oregon Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 1913 · Burnett, McBride, Moore, Ramsey
68 Or. 373; 137 P. 208; 1913 Ore. LEXIS 127

Lafky v. Albert

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice McBride.

This is an action for libel. The defendant demurred on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. We have examined the record, and are of the opinion that the language used is not libelous per se; and, there being no innuendo, the demurrer was properly sustained. As no good purpose would be served by perpetuating in the Oregon Reports the article over which the action arose, we omit it from the opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Moore, Mr. Justice Burnett and Mr. Justice Ramsey concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.